Campaign 2010

Countdown to Congressional Elections


The Rise of Corporate Freedom of Speech

$1.45 Billion on 3-14-2010

$2.9 Billion Spent in 08
on Congressional Race
See Major Contributors

Corporate money in politics is bad enough. Secret corporate money is intolerable.


Primary Election Results
(UPDATED: July 28, 2010)






"The Great 2010 Incumbent (Non-)Revolt"

Senate Primary’s
Incumbent Democrats
1 Loss; 3 Wins of 13
Incumbent Republicans
1 Loss; 8 Wins of 12

House Primary’s
Incumbent Democrats
1 Loss; 135 Wins of 245
Incumbent Republicans
2 Loss; 103 Wins of 158

Visual Facts

Hover to Pause.
Click Image for Larger Size.

National Debt Clock

Hover to Pause

WHEN Did You Become Fiscally Responsible?
BEFORE Obama or AFTER Obama??
January 20, 2009
$10,838,758,414,164.46 - ↑90%
Discretionary Spending at 48.6%

January 20, 2001
$5,719,124,940,098.04 - 36%
January 20, 1993
$4,192,107,025,882.17 - 62%
January 20, 1989
$2,601,104,000,000.00 - 189%
January 20, 1981
$909,041,000.000.00

Click Image for Full Size


Debt by President

Are You A Tea Party Hyprocrite??

(Click for Debt Details)

United States of Corporations

Thanks to the GOP's Supreme Court
(Click Flag for Full Size)
Corporate Bill of Rights

Quotes and Links

Hover to Pause
(Look for the Listings)

The Decade When the U.S. Lost Its Way

Tax Rate for Richest 400 Taxpayers Plummeted in Recent Decades, Even as Their Pre-Tax Incomes Skyrocketed

"The financial reform bill will determine whether Wall Street’s banks will serve the American economy or whether the American economy will continue to serve Wall Street's banks."

"While the economy doesn't function for most of us ordinary workers, it yields considerable reward for those at the top."

Republicans Are Locked in a Passionate Embrace with a Corpse and Won't Let Go

"The most important thing Republicans think is that if there are Americans who can't afford the insurance policies that private insurers are willing to offer, then that's their problem."

"It should tell you everything you need to know that, in lobbying to retain its bank supervisory powers, the Fed's allies include the big Wall Street banks."

"[Texas Republican Jeb] Hensarling told a Texas-size whopper — and then tried to claim Republican credit for Bill Clinton’s budget surpluses."

"The Supreme Court's 5-to-4 decision last week giving American corporations the right to unlimited political spending was an astonishing display of judicial arrogance, overreach and unjustified activism."

"It was wrong because nothing in the First Amendment dictates that corporations must be treated identically to people."

"They backed the truck up to Fort Knox in broad daylight. They emptied it out, we rescued them and they get $150 billion in bonuses."

"A huge, unregulated boom in which almost all the upside went directly into private hands, followed by a gigantic bust in which the losses were socialized."

So You Just Squandered Billions . . . Take Another Whack at It

Banks 'Too Big to Fail' Have Grown Even Bigger

Bankers' bonuses Beat Earnings as Industry Imploded

U.S. Rescue May Reach $23.7 Trillion

The Bank Bailouts — Corporate Welfarism

New Evidence Cheney Swayed Reaction to Leak - Valerie Plame

Once Again, The More You Watch Fox The Dumber You Are

"Over the past year, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have injected trillions of dollars into frozen financial markets, snapping up unwanted bonds, extending guarantees to banks and slashing interest rates."

Building a Better Capitalism

The End of Supply Side Economics

The Great Wealth Transfer

The Richer

Who Rules America? Power, Politics, and Social Change

Proponents of Estate Tax Repeal Are Resurrecting Old Misconceptions

Income Gaps Between Very Rich and Everyone Else More Than Tripled In Last Three Decades

Ending Plutocracy: A 12-Step Program

Our Gilded Age

The Rich and the Rest of Us

GOP's "Small Government" Talk is Hollow



This Week's Quotes (5) (Hover to Pause)
Dear Corporate America: Your taxes are NOT being raised. Your subsidy has expired! - The Old Man

"If we cannot as a nation move away from ideologically stimulated tribal warfare and scapegoating, we are in for a very unpleasant future"Retired Army Gen. Montgomery Meigs

“For big business to now claim that the government is ‘anti-business’ is like the umpire complaining about how badly his game was refereed”Kathryn Kolbert

“Rather than ‘all for one and one for all,’ the United States’ business leaders have adopted more of a ‘one for one and all for me’ approach, detrimental to our country's economic recovery”Amy L. Fraher

“Corporate executives excuse their inexcusable refusal to hire more workers and invest in new products and technologies with the tired old saw that it’s all the government’s fault. The Wall Street financial crisis has brought the economy to its knees and now the corporate sector has the audacity to blame government for the catastrophe?”Elizabeth Sherman

July 11, 2008

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac – Will Taxpayers Be Saddled With An Additional $6 Trillion Of Debt?

July 10, 2008

The Facts

That’s right; it’s TRILLION, with a capital “T“. If you have watched any news at all for the past three or four days you will know that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two government sponsored mortgage lenders, are in very serious financial trouble. It’s been quietly building for quite some time now with just an occasional mention by the media. Bloomberg published this article on the impending disaster today, July 10, 2008. Their woes are a direct result of the mortgage melt down that claimed Bear Stearns, and what will probably be many more before it is finished. The biggest problem with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is that they have about $12 trillion in outstanding home loans (debt), and they are responsible for about half of that, or $6 trillion.

My View

First, let’s point out that the current total US debt is well above $9 trillion. Even the best estimates is that it will take us about 75 years to pay that off, and that’s only if we start balancing our federal budget by 2010 (we all know that won’t happen) and raise our tax burden by a substantial margin; otherwise it’s anybody’s guess how long it will take. Now; if we have to add another $6 trillion to that to cover Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, our government will have little choice but to declare bankruptcy. In fact, there are many experts in the field that say we are already bankrupt, we just won’t admit it. If not bankruptcy, we will have to find some sucker country to loan us the money, in which case will eventually cost us as much as $20 trillion with interest, etc.

Second, let me debunk all those out there that are going to say the federal government and us taxpayers will not be held responsible for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Even Wikipedia implies the government is not responsible.  That’s a bunch of crock. Yes, I am aware that in 1968 they were converted into a private corporation with share holders. But the two are still government sponsored companies, which means the federal government basically stands behind them. And don’t think for one moment that the corporate management and share holders don’t know that. Otherwise, why would they ever fund $12 trillion of debt? No fat chance. You can find plenty of supporting documentation on line to confirm that we taxpayers will foot the bill, and “What Do Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Do” is one of them. Under “Do I have anything at stake in this issue”, you will find the following paragraph; “As a taxpayer, on the other hand, you have a cause for concern. The low borrowing costs of the GSEs is based on implicit Government backing for their $3+ trillion of debt and guarantees. If the GSEs ever have a financial disaster, the Government will have to bail them out and you and I will be on the hook for the cost”. GSE stands for “Government Sponsored Enterprises”. And I should point out that in 2003 (when this article was published) the two mortgage companies were only $3 trillion in debt. What private company would ever allow even that much debt to accumulate if they knew the government was not going to bail them out?

One thing we can all bet on; a lot of people have become extremely wealthy with the raping and pillaging of these two companies. And you can also bet they will not pay their fair share of the tax dollars that will be used to bail out the two companies. That’s the way the “supply-sider” politicians have set it up. And we, the real taxpayers of this country, have greatly aided them by saying “I don’t care, they are my political party and anything they do is OK with me!” Congratulations supply-sider supporters; you have helped put the last nail in our coffin.

UPDATE: I had prepared this post for earlier publication, but updated it this morning, July 11, 2008. This brief report, and others, are saying The New York Times is reporting that the government is considering “taking over” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A senior Bush administration official has said Bush is considering a plan for the takeover. Anyone care to “debunk” me now that we middle class and lower class taxpayers will not be saddled with the bill created by the supply-siders?

Bookmark and Share

2 comments to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac – Will Taxpayers Be Saddled With An Additional $6 Trillion Of Debt?

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>