Campaign 2010

Countdown to Congressional Elections


The most effective way to restrict democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: kings and princes, priestly castes, military juntas, party dictatorships, or modern corporations.
Noam Chomsky, M.I.T. emeritus Professor of Linguistics

The Rise of Corporate Freedom of Speech

(Surpassed 2008 total on August 18)

See Weekly Spending Totals

$2.9 Billion Spent in 08
on Congressional Race
See Major Contributors

Corporate money in politics is bad enough. Secret corporate money is intolerable.


Primary Election Results
(UPDATED: August 25, 2010)






"The Great 2010 Incumbent (Non-)Revolt"

Senate Primary’s
Incumbent Democrats
1 Loss; 6 Wins of 13
Incumbent Republicans
1 Loss; 9 Wins of 12

House Primary’s
Incumbent Democrats
2 Loss; 182 Wins of 245
Incumbent Republicans
2 Loss; 140 Wins of 158

General Election Candidates

Senate

House of Representatives

Visual Facts

Hover to Pause.
Click Image for Larger Size.

National Debt Clock

Hover to Pause

WHEN Did You Become Fiscally Responsible?
BEFORE Obama or AFTER Obama??
January 20, 2009
$10,838,758,414,164.46 - ↑90%
Discretionary Spending at 48.6%

January 20, 2001
$5,719,124,940,098.04 - 36%
January 20, 1993
$4,192,107,025,882.17 - 62%
January 20, 1989
$2,601,104,000,000.00 - 189%
January 20, 1981
$909,041,000.000.00

Click Image for Full Size


Debt by President

Are You A Tea Party Hyprocrite??

(Click for Debt Details)

United States of Corporations

Thanks to the GOP's Supreme Court
(Click Flag for Full Size)
Corporate Bill of Rights

Quotes and Links

Hover to Pause
(Look for the Listings)

The Decade When the U.S. Lost Its Way

Where Have All the Neocons Gone?

From Neocons to Crazy-Cons

America Builds an Aristocracy

Supreme immodesty: Why the justices play politics

The Biggest Medicare Fraud Ever

Enough Right-Wing Propaganda

Tax Rate for Richest 400 Taxpayers Plummeted in Recent Decades, Even as Their Pre-Tax Incomes Skyrocketed

"The financial reform bill will determine whether Wall Street’s banks will serve the American economy or whether the American economy will continue to serve Wall Street's banks."

"While the economy doesn't function for most of us ordinary workers, it yields considerable reward for those at the top."

Republicans Are Locked in a Passionate Embrace with a Corpse and Won't Let Go

"The most important thing Republicans think is that if there are Americans who can't afford the insurance policies that private insurers are willing to offer, then that's their problem."

"It should tell you everything you need to know that, in lobbying to retain its bank supervisory powers, the Fed's allies include the big Wall Street banks."

"[Texas Republican Jeb] Hensarling told a Texas-size whopper — and then tried to claim Republican credit for Bill Clinton’s budget surpluses."

"The Supreme Court's 5-to-4 decision last week giving American corporations the right to unlimited political spending was an astonishing display of judicial arrogance, overreach and unjustified activism."

"It was wrong because nothing in the First Amendment dictates that corporations must be treated identically to people."

"They backed the truck up to Fort Knox in broad daylight. They emptied it out, we rescued them and they get $150 billion in bonuses."

"A huge, unregulated boom in which almost all the upside went directly into private hands, followed by a gigantic bust in which the losses were socialized."

So You Just Squandered Billions . . . Take Another Whack at It

Banks 'Too Big to Fail' Have Grown Even Bigger

Bankers' bonuses Beat Earnings as Industry Imploded

U.S. Rescue May Reach $23.7 Trillion

The Bank Bailouts — Corporate Welfarism

New Evidence Cheney Swayed Reaction to Leak - Valerie Plame

Once Again, The More You Watch Fox The Dumber You Are

"Over the past year, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have injected trillions of dollars into frozen financial markets, snapping up unwanted bonds, extending guarantees to banks and slashing interest rates."

Building a Better Capitalism

The End of Supply Side Economics

The Great Wealth Transfer

The Richer

Who Rules America? Power, Politics, and Social Change

Proponents of Estate Tax Repeal Are Resurrecting Old Misconceptions

Income Gaps Between Very Rich and Everyone Else More Than Tripled In Last Three Decades

Ending Plutocracy: A 12-Step Program

Our Gilded Age

The Rich and the Rest of Us

GOP's "Small Government" Talk is Hollow


Distortions, Hypocrisy & More

"I'm not upset that you lied to me; I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you"
Friedrich Nietzsche
[Hover to Pause]

Today is

March 15, 2009

170 Million Dollars Of New Bonuses For AIG

March 15, 2009

The Facts

edward-m-liddyEdward M. Liddy, CEO of AIG, has said the company will pay out additional bonuses to the tune of $170 million. Once again, Liddy is using that same old stand-by worthless excuse that AIG has to take action in order to retain desirable talent. Timothy Geithner, Treasury Secretary, claims he’s not happy about the bonuses and said so in a meeting with Liddy last Wednesday. As a pacifier for Geithner, Liddy now says he will take a chance of loosing some people and lower a few of the bonuses. However, all he’s really doing is postponing parts of the bonuses until later in the year.

My View (and some more facts)

Liddy is blackmailing the government. He points out that there is still $1.6 trillion of bad assets in their portfolio, and if the government puts that in jeopardy the taxpayers will be left holding a much bigger empty bag. Therefore, in Liddy’s eyes, he has the government over the preverbal barrel. In fact, according to this article, AIG sent government officials a 21-page letter on March 10th (just days after the latest release of bailout funds) essentially saying that AIG was on the verge of collapse. The article quotes AIG as saying that the government should prevent “potentially catastrophic unforeseen consequences”, meaning more money – a lot more money. So Liddy feels perfectly comfortable in doling out millions more in bonuses without retribution.

Jim Hoagland, for the Washington Post, recently wrote the article “Follow The Money“, in which he points out just how close the public is in going ballistic over AIG and the others. Hoagland says he has been putting the question to several Obama Cabinet officials of how concerned or angry is the general public. The answer he almost always gets is “— concerned, but not angry. Pause. Not yet”.

Hoagland also points out in his article that billions of the bailout dollars handed over to AIG was used to pay off foreign banks. There are many according to Hoagland, but he quotes the Wall Street Journal as identifying Deutsche Bank of Frankfurt Germany as being one of those banks that received billions from AIG’s bailout money.

With the bonuses, AIG is demonstrating their conviction that ‘we know we are too big to fail’ and the government is going to do nothing about the bonuses. Putting up with the outrage of the taxpayers who are helpless to do anything about their action, and receiving a tongue lashing from a few government officials is a small price to pay for a few million dollars in their personal accounts. The fact that AIG and those employees know they wouldn’t have so much as a regular pay check had the taxpayer Calvary not come charging in makes no difference to them. They are well aware of having powerful friends in high places to protect them.

The only thing that’s going to bring all this to a complete stop is action by the common people. Until we are literally standing in front of the White House, the Capital, and Wall Street by the millions, this outrage is going to continue. The taxpayer piggy bank has been broken open and they are not going to stop until every drop of blood is sucked out of us.

My other post on AIG.

Bookmark and Share

2 comments to 170 Million Dollars Of New Bonuses For AIG

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>