Campaign 2010

Countdown to Congressional Elections


The Rise of Corporate Freedom of Speech

$1.45 Billion on 3-14-2010

$2.9 Billion Spent in 08
on Congressional Race
See Major Contributors

Corporate money in politics is bad enough. Secret corporate money is intolerable.


Primary Election Results
(UPDATED: July 28, 2010)






"The Great 2010 Incumbent (Non-)Revolt"

Senate Primary’s
Incumbent Democrats
1 Loss; 3 Wins of 13
Incumbent Republicans
1 Loss; 8 Wins of 12

House Primary’s
Incumbent Democrats
1 Loss; 135 Wins of 245
Incumbent Republicans
2 Loss; 103 Wins of 158

Visual Facts

Hover to Pause.
Click Image for Larger Size.

National Debt Clock

Hover to Pause

WHEN Did You Become Fiscally Responsible?
BEFORE Obama or AFTER Obama??
January 20, 2009
$10,838,758,414,164.46 - ↑90%
Discretionary Spending at 48.6%

January 20, 2001
$5,719,124,940,098.04 - 36%
January 20, 1993
$4,192,107,025,882.17 - 62%
January 20, 1989
$2,601,104,000,000.00 - 189%
January 20, 1981
$909,041,000.000.00

Click Image for Full Size


Debt by President

Are You A Tea Party Hyprocrite??

(Click for Debt Details)

United States of Corporations

Thanks to the GOP's Supreme Court
(Click Flag for Full Size)
Corporate Bill of Rights

Quotes and Links

Hover to Pause
(Look for the Listings)

The Decade When the U.S. Lost Its Way

Tax Rate for Richest 400 Taxpayers Plummeted in Recent Decades, Even as Their Pre-Tax Incomes Skyrocketed

"The financial reform bill will determine whether Wall Street’s banks will serve the American economy or whether the American economy will continue to serve Wall Street's banks."

"While the economy doesn't function for most of us ordinary workers, it yields considerable reward for those at the top."

Republicans Are Locked in a Passionate Embrace with a Corpse and Won't Let Go

"The most important thing Republicans think is that if there are Americans who can't afford the insurance policies that private insurers are willing to offer, then that's their problem."

"It should tell you everything you need to know that, in lobbying to retain its bank supervisory powers, the Fed's allies include the big Wall Street banks."

"[Texas Republican Jeb] Hensarling told a Texas-size whopper — and then tried to claim Republican credit for Bill Clinton’s budget surpluses."

"The Supreme Court's 5-to-4 decision last week giving American corporations the right to unlimited political spending was an astonishing display of judicial arrogance, overreach and unjustified activism."

"It was wrong because nothing in the First Amendment dictates that corporations must be treated identically to people."

"They backed the truck up to Fort Knox in broad daylight. They emptied it out, we rescued them and they get $150 billion in bonuses."

"A huge, unregulated boom in which almost all the upside went directly into private hands, followed by a gigantic bust in which the losses were socialized."

So You Just Squandered Billions . . . Take Another Whack at It

Banks 'Too Big to Fail' Have Grown Even Bigger

Bankers' bonuses Beat Earnings as Industry Imploded

U.S. Rescue May Reach $23.7 Trillion

The Bank Bailouts — Corporate Welfarism

New Evidence Cheney Swayed Reaction to Leak - Valerie Plame

Once Again, The More You Watch Fox The Dumber You Are

"Over the past year, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have injected trillions of dollars into frozen financial markets, snapping up unwanted bonds, extending guarantees to banks and slashing interest rates."

Building a Better Capitalism

The End of Supply Side Economics

The Great Wealth Transfer

The Richer

Who Rules America? Power, Politics, and Social Change

Proponents of Estate Tax Repeal Are Resurrecting Old Misconceptions

Income Gaps Between Very Rich and Everyone Else More Than Tripled In Last Three Decades

Ending Plutocracy: A 12-Step Program

Our Gilded Age

The Rich and the Rest of Us

GOP's "Small Government" Talk is Hollow



This Week's Quotes (5) (Hover to Pause)
Dear Corporate America: Your taxes are NOT being raised. Your subsidy has expired! - The Old Man

"If we cannot as a nation move away from ideologically stimulated tribal warfare and scapegoating, we are in for a very unpleasant future"Retired Army Gen. Montgomery Meigs

“For big business to now claim that the government is ‘anti-business’ is like the umpire complaining about how badly his game was refereed”Kathryn Kolbert

“Rather than ‘all for one and one for all,’ the United States’ business leaders have adopted more of a ‘one for one and all for me’ approach, detrimental to our country's economic recovery”Amy L. Fraher

“Corporate executives excuse their inexcusable refusal to hire more workers and invest in new products and technologies with the tired old saw that it’s all the government’s fault. The Wall Street financial crisis has brought the economy to its knees and now the corporate sector has the audacity to blame government for the catastrophe?”Elizabeth Sherman

April 20, 2009

Banks On TARP Money: “No Thanks”; Other Taxpayer Money: “Bring It On!”

April 20, 2009

Last fall we were introduced to a $700 billion taxpayer bailout by then Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. The public reacted with opened mouths, astonishment, and shock. Everyone with common sense couldn’t believe that our government officials were asking the taxpayers of this country to turn over that much money to the same crooks that bankrupt not only their own companies, but millions of other companies along with millions of citizens. Immediately the defenders of Wall Street went into action as if they already had their game plan in place and were only waiting for the word to get out.

Since then just about the only thing acknowledged, and certainly the only thing talked about, is the $700 billion. But that money was only a diversion while trillions more were, and still are, being quietly passed through the back door. No one, and I mean absolutely no one, will admit what the total amount is. Bits and pieces continue to leak out, but there seems to be no on-going detail tally available to the money suppliers. The policy seems to be ‘just keep sending the money, keep your mouth shut, and don’t ask any questions’.

According to Bloomberg, $12.8 trillion has been spent on or guaranteed to the US financial system since August 2007. We know that $336 billion has been “loan” through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and more than $2 trillion “loan” through the Federal Reserve. In case you have figured it out yet, the known loans are more than three times the amount ($700 billion TARP) that everyone talks about. So why aren’t they talking about the “other” money? Because it’s the latter that ties the banks to some government control, albeit it very little. Therefore, it’s the TARP money the banks want to repay. And what are they repaying it with? The “loans” from the FDIC and the Feds. Again, in case you haven’t noticed, it amounts to repaying taxpayer money with taxpayer money in order to remove restrictions.

JPMorgan Chase regrets “accepting” $25 billion, calling the TARP money a “scarlet letter”, and they want to repay it. However, they are willing to keep another $40 billion they have borrowed from the taxpayers outside TARP. The Washington Post describes it as “a breakup and embrace”, which is a pretty apt description. By paying back the TARP money, they sever all ties relative to any government control. The same Washington Post article points out that by repaying the Treasury money, the banks don’t have to make any sacrifices such as “restricting executive pay”. And guess who’s making the decision to repay the TARP money? You got it — executives.

Douglas Elliott of the Brookings Institution said in reference to the non-TARP money “the other programs have no strings attached. What’s not to like about it from the perspective of the banks?” And the Federal Reserve, with Ben Bernanke at the helm, is refusing to tell the public who they’re loaning our money to, but the Washington Post quotes financial analysts as saying “it is highly likely that every major firm is on the list”.

Bloomberg has filed a law suit to make government documents available to the press and public. But few believe they will be successful. It’s rather doubtful anyone believes them, but both the banks and the government say that by releasing such information, it could cause a run on banks and other financial institutions if that information was revealed. But it doesn’t matter if that’s true or not true, with our government over the past 30 years, all that matters is that they declared a “reason” (definition: “excuse”), therefore the book is closed on the issue as far as they are concerned.

If you so desire, you can go to the Federal Reserves website and click on their “Monetary Policy” tab and try to figure out what they are telling us. But it won’t tell you much, even if you can decipher it. The sole objective of the feds and other money-laundering governmental departments is to protect the banks. And the banks attitude is “let me give back the money that holds me responsible, but I’ll keep the money that allows me to run amok and steal as much as I can, thank you”.

Bookmark and Share

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>