Campaign 2010

Countdown to Congressional Elections


The most effective way to restrict democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: kings and princes, priestly castes, military juntas, party dictatorships, or modern corporations.
Noam Chomsky, M.I.T. emeritus Professor of Linguistics

The Rise of Corporate Freedom of Speech

(Surpassed 2008 total on August 18)

See Weekly Spending Totals

$2.9 Billion Spent in 08
on Congressional Race
See Major Contributors

Corporate money in politics is bad enough. Secret corporate money is intolerable.


Primary Election Results
(UPDATED: August 25, 2010)






"The Great 2010 Incumbent (Non-)Revolt"

Senate Primary’s
Incumbent Democrats
1 Loss; 6 Wins of 13
Incumbent Republicans
1 Loss; 9 Wins of 12

House Primary’s
Incumbent Democrats
2 Loss; 182 Wins of 245
Incumbent Republicans
2 Loss; 140 Wins of 158

General Election Candidates

Senate

House of Representatives

Visual Facts

Hover to Pause.
Click Image for Larger Size.

National Debt Clock

Hover to Pause

WHEN Did You Become Fiscally Responsible?
BEFORE Obama or AFTER Obama??
January 20, 2009
$10,838,758,414,164.46 - ↑90%
Discretionary Spending at 48.6%

January 20, 2001
$5,719,124,940,098.04 - 36%
January 20, 1993
$4,192,107,025,882.17 - 62%
January 20, 1989
$2,601,104,000,000.00 - 189%
January 20, 1981
$909,041,000.000.00

Click Image for Full Size


Debt by President

Are You A Tea Party Hyprocrite??

(Click for Debt Details)

United States of Corporations

Thanks to the GOP's Supreme Court
(Click Flag for Full Size)
Corporate Bill of Rights

Quotes and Links

Hover to Pause
(Look for the Listings)

The Decade When the U.S. Lost Its Way

Where Have All the Neocons Gone?

From Neocons to Crazy-Cons

America Builds an Aristocracy

Supreme immodesty: Why the justices play politics

The Biggest Medicare Fraud Ever

Enough Right-Wing Propaganda

Tax Rate for Richest 400 Taxpayers Plummeted in Recent Decades, Even as Their Pre-Tax Incomes Skyrocketed

"The financial reform bill will determine whether Wall Street’s banks will serve the American economy or whether the American economy will continue to serve Wall Street's banks."

"While the economy doesn't function for most of us ordinary workers, it yields considerable reward for those at the top."

Republicans Are Locked in a Passionate Embrace with a Corpse and Won't Let Go

"The most important thing Republicans think is that if there are Americans who can't afford the insurance policies that private insurers are willing to offer, then that's their problem."

"It should tell you everything you need to know that, in lobbying to retain its bank supervisory powers, the Fed's allies include the big Wall Street banks."

"[Texas Republican Jeb] Hensarling told a Texas-size whopper — and then tried to claim Republican credit for Bill Clinton’s budget surpluses."

"The Supreme Court's 5-to-4 decision last week giving American corporations the right to unlimited political spending was an astonishing display of judicial arrogance, overreach and unjustified activism."

"It was wrong because nothing in the First Amendment dictates that corporations must be treated identically to people."

"They backed the truck up to Fort Knox in broad daylight. They emptied it out, we rescued them and they get $150 billion in bonuses."

"A huge, unregulated boom in which almost all the upside went directly into private hands, followed by a gigantic bust in which the losses were socialized."

So You Just Squandered Billions . . . Take Another Whack at It

Banks 'Too Big to Fail' Have Grown Even Bigger

Bankers' bonuses Beat Earnings as Industry Imploded

U.S. Rescue May Reach $23.7 Trillion

The Bank Bailouts — Corporate Welfarism

New Evidence Cheney Swayed Reaction to Leak - Valerie Plame

Once Again, The More You Watch Fox The Dumber You Are

"Over the past year, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have injected trillions of dollars into frozen financial markets, snapping up unwanted bonds, extending guarantees to banks and slashing interest rates."

Building a Better Capitalism

The End of Supply Side Economics

The Great Wealth Transfer

The Richer

Who Rules America? Power, Politics, and Social Change

Proponents of Estate Tax Repeal Are Resurrecting Old Misconceptions

Income Gaps Between Very Rich and Everyone Else More Than Tripled In Last Three Decades

Ending Plutocracy: A 12-Step Program

Our Gilded Age

The Rich and the Rest of Us

GOP's "Small Government" Talk is Hollow


Distortions, Hypocrisy & More

"I'm not upset that you lied to me; I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you"
Friedrich Nietzsche
[Hover to Pause]

Today is

January 28, 2010

Tax Breaks Stimulate Hiring? Bull!

Update: January 29, 2010

This subject has resulted in a tremendous amount of conversation in the main stream media. The Republicans have somewhat embraced it, but say it doesn’t go far enough. They want huge tax breaks extended to large corporations and wealthy individuals. But the most informative comments have come from the small business owners themselves, including the National Federation of Independent Business.

What I so glaringly pointed out in this original post was confirmed by small business owners. Some are saying “until you have customers coming in the door, you’re going to have less of a reason to hire”. Others are saying that they wouldn’t take on new employees unless there was work for them to do. Well, any fool can figure that out.

But the Obama administration pushes on. Rep. Nydia M. Velazquez, who heads the House Committee on Small Business, is still insisting that the reason small businesses aren’t hiring is because they can’t get a loans. This exemplifies just have deaf our politicians are. When the people they insist on helping tell them they don’t want that help but the politicians keep forging ahead, something is bad wrong. But Velazques and many of the others know of only one way to conduct business — spend taxpayers money. They aren’t looking after the people; they are looking after self, in the form of bragging points during the next election. Which is exactly how the Republicans run their business. So what’s new.

January 28, 2010

Here’s the case – I own a business that produces widgets. Sales is what it is. I have X-number of employees on my payroll. I’ve had to cut back due to the sagging economy, but the remaining employees have stepped up to the plate. As a result, production and sales has not suffered. To show my appreciation for the extra work, I’ve given each my employees an accompanying pay raise. Even so, my payroll is still noticeably less than what it was, the burden on company benefits has decreased and I’ve seen other benefits as well. Now comes a tax-break incentive from the government for me to hire more people. I’ve been motivated and hire more people. Within three months my profit margins have fallen even though production and sales has not. What happened??

Last night, in his State of the Union address, President Obama proposed a tax break for employers who will hire more people. This is nothing new — we hear this all the time, but mostly from the right; ‘reduce taxes and employers will hire more people’ — you know what I’m talking about — trickle-down-economics. And although Obama’s proposal targets a different kind of employer, he’s assuming that an employer has already elected to make less profits because he prefers not to have enough people on his payroll. That is asinine! If the market for widgets is there, the employer will supply it. Not because he’s getting a tax break from big daddy, but because higher sales equal higher profits. And if that requires more people, he’ll hire them.

No one can convince anyone that a market demand will not be filled without a tax break. The lure of profits will fill the void — with or without tax breaks. This is known as capitalism. If a potential employer needs tax breaks to start a business for a market void, then the market really isn’t there. He’ll have to rely on perpetual tax breaks to stay in business, thus becoming a ward of the state.

This “idea” of cutting taxes for employers in the name of  stimulating hiring is as old as the tax codes themselves. The real objective is ‘taxes are for the little people — not for the wealthy or corporations’.

Although I heard a couple of things in Obama’s speech last night that make a lot to sense — at least to reasonable, unbiased minds — he certainly blew it on this one. However, I suspect “mentioning” a tax cut was designed to appease the right. But if he hasn’t accepted by now that the right isn’t going to ‘come on board’ for anything, he’s never going to accept it. So let’s forget about any kind of tax breaks. Instead, accept a one-term presidency, embarrass the hell out of each and every member of Congress who refuses to get on board with the Fiscal Task Force, raise the hell out of taxes FOR EVERYONE, remove all those tax breaks for corporations, prosecute anyone and everyone who hides their money overseas to avoid taxes, end the war in Iraq, curtail the giveaways to everyone including foreign countries and LETS PAY THE DAMN DEBT OFF. And if the right wants to fight him on it, make absolutely certain it’s thrown in the faces of the voters every day — and every hour if necessary.

Bookmark and Share

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>