(The) C0MM0N PE0PLES S0URCE for News

An 0ld Man's View of Today's Headlines

  • page one news
  • Additional Reading
  • Important Links
  • Notable Quotes II
  • Archives
  • About CPSN
  • Who’s Buying the 2010 Congressional Election?
  • Subscribe to CPS-News 
»♠♠ "On The Air" Since 2007 ♠♠«
>>> Credibility: The quality, capability, or power to elicit belief <<<
>>Once Lost - Never Regained<<
  • Campaign 2010

    $5.2 Billion Spent in '08
    ↑
    See Major Contributors
  • Today’s Capitalist

    "The government has all the responsibility — but no authority over us or claims on our profits."

    (Rollover Image)
  • What’s New This Week

    Karl Rove's Book of Lies

    Healthcare 2011: "In 2011 employees of big companies will pay significantly higher premiums, deductibles and co-payments, and be charged more to cover spouses."

    The "12 Cent" Rule
    Americans' Buffet Mentality:
    "We paid at the door to the health-care feast, so let's consume all we can."

    Death Grip: Republicans Are Locked in a Passionate Embrace with a Corpse and Won't Let Go

  • National Debt Clock

    WHEN Did You Become Fiscally Responsible?
    BEFORE Obama or AFTER Obama??
    January 20, 2009
    $10,838,758,414,164.46
    Discretionary Spending @ 48.6%

    January 20, 2001
    $5,719,124,940,098.04
    January 20, 1993
    $4,192,107,025,882.17
    January 20, 1989
    $2,601,104,000,000.00
    January 20, 1981
    $909,041,000.000.00

    Debt by President


    Click Image for Full Size

    Are You A Tea Party Hyprocrite??

    (Click for Debt Details)
  • Destroyers of the Republican Party

      Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.
  • Do You Know Their Names
    (Click ? to Find Out)

  • United States of Corporations

    Thanks to the GOP's Supreme Court
    (Click Flag for Full Size)
    Corporate Bill of Rights
  • Democratic Party Traitors

      Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.
  • Who Are These Traitors?
    (Click Black Rose)
  • Interesting Links

    • Change in National Debt by President
    • Financial Bailout List
    • Historical Federal Debt
    • The 2003 Prescription Drug Bill
    • The Corporate Bill of Rights
    • Who Voted Against the Fiscal Task Force
    • Who's Paying to Kill Health Care Reform

  • Price Bloated 30% by Speculators
  • Politically Driven Stuff

    • Building a Better Capitalism
    • Democrats for Rich Heirs?
    • Proponents of Estate Tax Repeal Are Resurrecting Old Misconceptions
    • Stephen Moore Misled on Wealthy Americans’ Tax Burden
    • Tax Competition: Why It Is Not a Good Thing
    • The End of Supply Side Economics
    • The Great Wealth Transfer
    • The Richer
    • The Small-Business Myth
  • My Favorite Sites

    • A Taxing Matter – About Taxes & Tax Laws
    • Angry Bear
    • Center on Budget & Policy Priorities
    • Cynical Synapse
    • Neiman Watchdog – Questions the Press Should Ask
    • Start Making Sense
    • Understanding Tax

  • No Regrets
    I Remember!
    Ok, What Was It!?

← Why Rich People Are Rich And Poor People Are Poor Goldman Sachs’ Blankfein Does It Again! →

Texting And Cell Phone Usage While Driving

February 1st, 2010 · 2 Comments · General

[Translate]

February 1, 2010  

Using cell phones and texting while driving has become a big issue of late. 19 states have already ban texting while driving, along with Washington D.C. Nearly two dozen others are seriously considering it. 6 states have ban the use of hand-held cell phones while driving. And like anything else a government does or wants to do, this one too has its supporters and opponents. Those who support the new laws often point to their own experience, and the ones who don’t keep insisting its not a danger. That’s why the latter is certain to be praising the latest survey regarding the use of cell phones while driving. The survey says cell phone bans have not decreased traffic accidents. But what about common sense?

“Common sense” — now there’s a phrase for the ages. I sometimes wonder if there’s anyone who has never used it. I guess I’m supposed to place a link here that will take you to the definition; but I won’t. Talk about something that is certainly left up to ones own interpretation, this has to rank near the top. So instead, I will use the word “logical”, although it too has room for interpretation.

No doubt most of those who oppose banning these widow/widower-makers have experienced a close call by someone who got distracted while driving, or they know of someone who did. But these folks believe they don’t (or won’t) get distracted. Unfortunately, that sort of thinking has been the downfall of many; e.g., drunk drivers.

As noted, many of us who support the banning have had personal experiences of some kind, and I’m no different. I spend a lot of time on the highways every year, and having done so, I’ve seen my fair share of distracted drivers who were using cell phones and texting.

I recall one incident when on a 9-hour trip, and traveling on an Interstate highway; keeping an eye in the rear view mirror as I usually do. My wife and I were on a long bridge traveling in the right hand lane, along with a lot of other traffic, when I noticed a truck in my rear view mirror approaching in the left lane. Vehicles in the right lane were constantly swerving to the right to avoid being hit because the truck driver was constantly invading their space. Of course, those in the right lane had little room to maneuver due to the bridge guard rails. I mentioned to my wife that we had a drunk driver approaching. So I kept a very close eye on him, which put me in danger of hitting the vehicle in front of me had traffic slowed un-expectantly. The driver of the truck finally came along side of me and almost hit my car. I blew my horn which startled him and caused him to look up. Look up from what, you ask? From texting! He had both arms laid across the top of the steering wheel holding his phone and punching the text buttons with both hands.

Of course that story is only one of many I could tell, and is no different than ones millions of other drivers could tell. But another story goes back years before the incident I just described. It was during the days when I too thought I wasn’t being distracted from using cell phones. I was working then (since retired), which required a lot of driving. On this particular trip I was on a road I was very familiar with as I had traveled it many, many times. I received a call on my old bag phone (if you’re old enough, you’ll remember those). The call was from an old friend I had not seen or heard from for more than 35 years. We talked for the better part of half an hour. When the call was over I started evaluating where I was and realized I didn’t know. When I finally figured it out, it was obvious that I had traveled for many miles unaware that I was even driving. But that won’t happen to you, will it?

Ok, so continuing on: a recent survey says that banning the use of cell phones while driving has not decreased the number of accidents. But come on — lets be logical!! (There’s that word)

I personally know of someone who is now very old and still a very dangerous driver. I use the word “still” because this person has always been that way, even when in their 40’s. On two-lane country highways this person would go around cars entering sharp curves and just before topping very high hills (that some would describe as mountainous) or driving for several minutes looking at and talking about something off in the distance. And that person never had an accident until very late in life, and, I don’t know of anyone else having an accident due to this person. However, it wasn’t because of not doing something dangerous; it was nothing but lady luck — being in the wrong place at the right time.

If accidents have not increased due to the usage of cell phones and texting while driving, pure logic tells one that it’s mostly likely due to nothing but luck. But then again you have to remember how statistics are gathered. For example, when opponents of cigarette smoking gather their death related “facts”, they use some very peculiar stats. One such example is a man who smoked from the age of 18 to age 23. When he died from cancer at the age of 80-something, that death was recorded as a smoking related death.

Now I am not saying that traffic accident statistics are gathered in the same way, and I certainly am not insinuating tobacco doesn’t cause cancer. But when the high potential of having an accident caused by using something as distracting as texting — and in many cases, a cell phone — is denied, then the deniers should probably reexamine their thinking.

“Safe” does not apply to multi-tasking when driving is one of those task. If you think so, maybe you should ask yourself this question: Would I want to be on an airplane, without autopilot, if the pilot was texting?

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Cell Phone·Driving·Texting

Return To Top

2 Comments so far ↓

  • Cynical SynapseNo Gravatar // Feb 1, 2010 at 9:09 AM

    Excellent post, Old Man. It only takes a second at highway speeds to end up in a serious or fatal accident, regardless of the distration.

    Most distrations, such as the radio, a sandwich, or beverage, are momentary and relatively infrequent. Texting is repetitive and, like talking on the phone, ongoing.

    Just like passages in the bible, you can find statistics to support just about any position you want to take. The question is, is your position logical? It’s not rocket science to conclude texting while driving carries a high risk of being in an accident.

  • Krystal KidNo Gravatar // Feb 1, 2010 at 11:06 AM

    80% percent of all rear end collisions (the most frequent vehicle accident) are caused by driver inattention, following too closely, external distraction (talking on cell phones, shaving, applying makeup, fiddling with the radio or CD player, texting, etc.) and poor judgment. I doubt if we’ll ever stop the madness so I got one of these sparebumper.com to protect my family.

Leave a Comment (Cancel)

Return To Top

  • Click The Old Man To
    Email Him

  • (Click for review)
    OR
    Read About the Budget Cuts
    by Clicking

    For the Original Unedited
    FY 2011


  • The Old Man’s Political Compass

    (Click On Compass)
  • Random Posts

    • GOP Will Unveil Healthcare Plan Today (Video) - Update
    • Angelo Mozillo Charged With Fraud (Video)
    • Random Thoughts on Other Notable Headlines of the Day – Issue VII
    • Dick Cheney To Request Lower Oil Prices?
    • CNBC’s Squawk Box Goes To Washington – Videos
  • CPSN Recent Post

    • Uncle Sam’s IOU’s To Be Called In
    • Why No Financial Reform Bill Yet?
    • The Arrogant Richard S. Fuld Jr. of Lehman Brothers and The Great Divide On Financial Reform
    • Quoting Worthy Quotes From Another Worthy Book
    • Welcome To The GOP’s Supreme Court World
  • CPSN Categories

  • CPSN Archives

  • Search

  • Where’s CPS News Read?


    Locations of visitors to this page
    Maps Archived In January
  • Site Navigation II

  • LinkBacks

    blogarama - the blog directory News & Media Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

    Blog Directory blog search directory

    Blog Directory & Search engine bar

    Blog Directory News blogs & blog posts

    CCleaner - Freeware Windows Optimization

    bar

    Favicon maker- Create a favicon from any image

    myspace layouts

    Myspace Layouts

    Blog Directory


Scroll To Top

(The) C0MM0N PE0PLES S0URCE for News

Formally American Citizens News Network
Powered by
English العربية česky Cymraeg dansk Deutsch ελληνική español فارسی suomi français Gaeilge עברית magyar bahasa Indonesia íslenska italiano lietuvių Malti Nederlands norsk polski português română русский svenska ภาษาไทย Filipino Türkçe tiếng Việt powered byGoogle